001) than the other groups of patients With respect to HIV-relat

001) than the other groups of patients. With respect to HIV-related variables,

we did not find any significant difference in immunological or virological status, or the time since diagnosis. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients with lipodystrophy among those with atherosclerosis and higher CVD risk (P<0.001). With respect to the conventional CVD risk factors, we found statistically significant differences among the three groups in relation to blood pressure (P<0.001), fasting glucose (P<0.001), serum cholesterol (P<0.001), LDL cholesterol (P=0.003) and triglycerides (P<0.001). We did not observe any significant differences with respect to HDL cholesterol and apoA-1 concentrations. Of particular Venetoclax order note in the present study was that plasma MCP-1 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with atherosclerosis,

but with a low CVD risk, than in patients without atherosclerosis (P=0.006). In addition, oxLDL and PON1 concentrations were significantly higher Buparlisib nmr in patients with atherosclerosis and >10% risk (P=0.013 and P=0.006, respectively) than in patients without atherosclerosis. Mean CIMT was significantly higher in patients with higher CVD risk [0.90 (0.29) mM vs. 0.74 (0.14) mM; P<0.001]. In the logistic regression analysis, the variables that were significantly associated with the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with low estimated Progesterone CVD risk were age [odds ratio (OR) 1.285; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.084–1.524; P=0.004], BMI (OR 0.779; 95% CI 0.642–0.994; P=0.044), oxLDL (OR 1.026; 95% CI 1.001–1.051; P=0.041), and MCP-1 concentration (OR 1.027; 95% CI 1.004–1.050; P=0.020). Viral suppression and immune reconstitution have become achievable goals in the treatment of HIV infection as a consequence of effective antiretroviral drugs becoming available under the various public health systems in developed countries [1]. However, CVD has increasingly been reported as a clinical

complication of HIV infection [2]. The pathogenic factors associated with an increase in CVD risk in this relatively young population are mainly dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance related to antiretroviral treatment [3]. Chronic HIV infection together with the pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory status of these individuals could also play an important role in the increase in CVD, as has been demonstrated previously [5]. Because there is still controversy regarding the application of these population-derived CVD risk scores to HIV-infected patients [12–15], we decided to assess the agreement of the FRS with the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis in a representative sample of this HIV-infected patient population. We found a good concordance between the estimated FRS and atherosclerosis (as measured by CIMT) in patients with FRS≥10%.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>