08 The results obtained by laser light scattering tests were hig

08. The results obtained by laser light scattering tests were higher than those observed by SEM that was related selleck kinase inhibitor to hydrodynamic diameter of swollen polymeric

nanoparticles in water.10 Drug loading and entrapment efficiency for all samples are shown in Table 1. The choice of the method to produce nanoparticles is strongly dependent on the identity of the drug that is going to be encapsulated. Hydrophobic water-insoluble drugs are more efficiently encapsulate by the simple ESE or nanoprecipitation.11 The main problem in the preparation of carvone and anethole loaded nanoparticles was volatility of them. So in this study a method with the shortest time of process to achieve the nanoparticles with lowest evaporation carvone and anethole was assessed. In ESE method, evaporation of organic phase takes a long time (about 3 h) and probably we lose a lot of carvone and anethole. The highest drug loading in this method was 0.29% for anethole and 0.33% for carvone. Hence, nanoprecipitation method without evaporation and freeze drying steps was applied and antimicrobial test was examined in suspension form of nanoparticles. The highest drug loading in this method was 14.73% for anethole and 13.64% for carvone. Some of advantages associated with this method

like: large amount of toxic solvents are avoided, small particle size with narrow size distribution are obtained, and without the use of external energy source.12 The main problem with the nanoprecipitation is the frequent agglomeration of particles due to find more the lack of a stabilizer. This can be solved using efficient stirring, by slow addition of the organic phase to the aqueous phase, and by selection of an adequate solvent system.12 The high DCM/acetone volume ratio in the organic phase of ESE method led to an improvement in entrapment efficiency but this improvement was not so Fossariinae significant (2.9% for anethole and 3.35% for carvone). Rapid diffusion of acetone into the outer phase may be the reason for such low entrapment efficiency. The high polymer/drug concentration in the injection phase with the low ratio of water: DMSO led to a significant improvement in

entrapment efficiency of nanoprecipitation method (87.3% for anethole and 68.2% for carvone). The in vitro release behavior of the two essential oil-loaded nanoparticles is summarized in the cumulative percentage release shown in Fig. 3. The initial burst release was detected for both nanoparticles during the first 6 h. The carvone-loaded nanoparticles showed a higher burst release (36%) compared with the anethole-loaded nanoparticles that release only 16% during the same time period. The ether group of anethole makes it more lipophil than carvone that leads to more encapsulation of anethole and takes longer time to diffuse from nanoparticles to the buffer phosphate medium. The initial burst could be ascribed to antimicrobial agent distributed at or just beneath the surface of the nanoparticles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>