5) 0(0.0) 0.12 (0.73) 0(0.0) 2(15.4) 0.5 (0.48) 2(6.9) GSK872 mw 0(0.0) 0.15 (0.69) Poor (2) 9(20.5) 11(32.4) 7(22.6) 2(15.4) 6(20.7) 3(20.0) Average (3) 22(50.0) 15(44.1) 16(51.6) 6(46.2) 12(41.4) 10(66.7) Good (4) 10(22.7) 6(17.6) 7(22.6) 3(23.1) 8(27.6) 2(13.3) Excellent (5) 1(2.3) 2(5.9) 1(3.2) 0(0.0) 1(3.4) 0(0.0) Consumption of the DS* No (1) 10(22.7) 8(23.5) 1.51 (0.22) 8(25.8) 2(15.4) 1.63 (0.20) 9(31.0) 1(6.7) 0.9 (0.34) Yes. but not regularly (2) 17(38.6) 6(17.6) 13(41.9) 4(30.8) 9(31.0) 8(53.3) Yes. regularly (3) 17(38.6)

20(58.8) 10(32.3) 7(53.8) 11(37.9) 6(40.0) Trust in coaches regarding DS Yes 26(59.1)     19(61.3) 4(30.8)   15(51.7) 11(73.3)   No 18(40.9) 12(38.7) 9(69.2) 14(48.3) 4(26.7) Trust in physicians

regarding DS Yes 24(54.5)     19(61.3) 5(38.5)   15(51.7) 9(60.0)   No 20(45.5) 12(38.7) 8(61.5) 14(48.3) 6(40.0) Primary source of information on DS I have no knowledge on this problem 6(13.6) 7(20.6)   2(6.5) 4(30.8)   5(17.2) 1(6.7)   Coach 10(22.7) 8(23.5) 10(32.3) 0(0.0) 5(17.2) 5(33.3) Formal education (school. professional seminars. etc.) 7(15.9) 4(11.8) 2(6.5) 5(38.5) 5(17.2) 2(13.3) Self-education (Internet. literature. booklets. etc.) 21(47.7) 15(44.1) selleck 17(54.8) 4(30.8) 14(48.3) 7(46.7) GDC-0941 nmr LEGEND: A – athletes; C – coaches; O – Olympic class athletes; NO – Non-Olympic class athletes; C1 – single crew; C2 – double crew; frequencies – f, percentage – %; KW – Kruskall-Wallis test; p – statistical significance for df = 1; number in parentheses presents ordinal values for each ordinal variable; * coaches were asked about DS usage of their athletes. The self-determined knowledge regarding doping issues tends to be below average, with no significant differences between athletes and coaches. Athletes and coaches share opinions about the occurrence of doping in sailing, and one out of three believe that doping occurs to some extent. Opinions about penalties for doping offences tend to favor rigid penalties, including lifetime suspension from competition.

The likelihood of doping is low among the study respondents, and only one athlete declare that he/she was likely Inositol oxygenase to try doping in the future. Sixty percent of athletes recognized doping as an issue of fairness and not primarily as a health-threatening behavior, and there is no significant difference between athletes and coaches in any of the studied doping factors.