In the three other cases, holes injected into the metal should immediately move to the metal/Si interface where band bending will hold them. Therefore there should not be any diffusion of holes away from the metal particles in any case and Ag cannot inject holes into Si. Nonetheless, metal induced etching is observed for all four of these metals and etching

is observed away from this interface as evidenced by photoluminescent por-Si formation surrounding the metal nanoparticle. These observations call for an alternative mechanism to explain etching. I propose that rather than thinking of the metal particles Saracatinib supplier as sources of holes, they should be thought of in terms of charged particles with some density of holes injected by the oxidizing agent. The charge they hold creates an electric field in their vicinity. The potential difference induced

by this electric field will change the hole density in the region around the nanoparticles including regions far from the nanoparticle just as would the application of a bias at a nanoelectrode. With a sufficiently large field, the hole density can be raised in the surrounding area sufficiently to facilitate electrochemical etching or even electropolishing, just as Lenvatinib in vitro in anodic etching when the entire sample rather than just a local portion of the sample is biased. Using the methods we previously developed [4] to determine the stoichiometry in stain etching without a metal catalyst, we have found that the stoichiometry of both hole injection and H2 production vary for the four different

metals shown here. We have shown that stain etching was dominated by a valence 2 process [4]. The observation of strong visible photoluminescence was confirmation of the production of nanocrystalline nanoporous Si. Metal-assisted etching using VO2 + as the oxidant in the presence of a few percent of a monolayer of Ag or Au nanoparticles exhibited the same stoichiometry. In the presence of Pt, a valence not 4 process dominated, which led to rapid production of photoluminescent nanoporous Si. Pd acted much differently. Whereas none of the other metals induced etching in the absence of VO2 +, consistent with prior reports [22], we found that etching at a very slow rate begins in the presence of Pd even in the absence of VO2 +. In addition, whereas the rate follows steady first-order kinetics with respect to VO2 + consumption, just like all the other metals and stain etching in the absence of metals, neither H2 production nor the valence of etching is constant for Pd. Etching in the presence of Pd is at first dominated by electropolishing and then proceeded by a mixture of electropolishing and valence 2 porous Si production. In all four cases, the rate of etching in the presence of a metal is significantly faster than for stain etching, i.e., the metal nanoparticles catalyze the injection of holes compared to the rate at a bare Si this website surface.