Statistical analysis was done with Student’s t test, chi(2) test,

Statistical analysis was done with Student’s t test, chi(2) test, logistic regression, and ROC analysis, as appropriate, with significance set at p<0.05.

Findings 952 severely burned paediatric patients were admitted to the centre learn more between 1998 and 2008. All groups were comparable in age (mean 7.3 [SD 5.3] years, ranging from 6.1 [5.1] years in the 30-39% TBSA group to 9.6 [5.4] years in the 90-100% TBSA group) and sex distribution (628 [66%] boys, ranging from 59% [73/123]

in the 60-69% TBSA group to 82% [42/51] in the 90-100% TBSA group). 123 (13%) patients died (increasing from 3% [five of 180] in the 30-39% TBSA group to 55% [28/51] in the 90-100% TBSA group; p<0.0001), 154 (16%) developed multiorgan failure (increasing from 6% [ten] in the 30-39% TBSA group to 45% [23] in the 90-100% TBSA group; p<0.0001), and 89 (9%) had sepsis (increasing from 2% [three] in the 30-39% TBSA group to 26% [13] in the 90-100% TBSA group; p<0.0001). Burn size of 62% TBSA was a crucial threshold for mortality (odds ratio 10.07, 95% CI 5.56-18.22, p<0.0001).

Interpretation We established that, in a modern paediatric burn care setting, a burn size of roughly 60% TBSA is a crucial threshold for postburn morbidity and mortality. On the basis of these findings, we recommend

that paediatric patients with greater than 60% TBSA burns be immediately transferred to a specialised burn centre. Furthermore, at the burn centre, patients should be treated with increased vigilance and improved therapies, in view of the increased risk of poor outcome associated with this burn size.”
“Objective: Momelotinib ic50 To determine whether

placebo responses can be explained by characteristics of the patient, the practitioner, or their interpersonal interaction. Methods: We performed an analysis of videotape and psychometric data from a clinical Amino acid trial of patients with irritable bowel syndrome who were treated with placebo acupuncture in either a warm empathic interaction (Augmented, n = 96), a neutral interaction (Limited, n = 97), or a waitlist control (Waitlist, n = 96). We examined the relationships between the placebo response and a) patient personality and demographics; b) treating practitioner; and c) the patient-practitioner interaction as captured on videotape and rated by the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set. Results: Patient extraversion, agreeableness, openness to experience, and female gender were associated with placebo response, but these effects held only in the augmented group. Regression analyses controlling for all other independent variables suggest that only extraversion is an independent predictor of placebo response. There were significant differences between practitioners in outcomes; this effect was twice as large as the effect attributable to treatment group assignment.

Comments are closed.