To our knowledge, neither of these has been reported selleck chemicals previously with glucose metabolism isolated CNS WD. Although isolated CNS WD is rare, there are sufficient cases for proposal of two distinct imaging presentations. Panegyres et al. (2006) propose that the two recognizable imaging presentations in isolated CNS WD are (A) multiple enhancing lesions on CT or MRI correlating with various neurologic Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical signs/symptoms and (B) solitary mass lesions on CT or MRI resulting in focal neurologic symptoms. In their review of cases in the literature, only one other case of suspected isolated CNS WD had no lesions on imaging (Louis et al. 1996), but they excluded this case due to the lack of confirmatory tissue or molecular pathology.

Our review of that case reveals that the presentation was similar to our patient, with supranuclear gaze Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical palsy and extrapyramidal symptoms. It has been reported previously that systemic WD with extension to the CNS typically has an imaging appearance consistent with a basal encephalitis and/or ependymitis (Grossman et al. 1981; Schnider et al. 1995) but can have normal imaging (Black et al. 2010). Our case and the above unconfirmed case suggest that in addition to systemic WD that extends to the CNS, isolated CNS WD can also have normal imaging. Therefore, when there is reasonable clinical suspicion for CNS WD,

it should not be ruled out simply due to an absence of MRI lesions. Our patient had a positive Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical CSF 14-3-3 protein but did not have CJD. The CSF Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 14-3-3 protein has a high sensitivity and specificity for CJD, such that in cases of rapidly progressive dementia, it is a recommended test by the American Academy of Neurology for confirming or excluding the diagnosis of CJD (Knopman et al. 2001). However, false-positive CSF 14-3-3 protein has been described in many cases of rapidly progressive dementia, with diagnoses as varied as Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, glioma, CNS vasculitis, paraneoplastic disorders, and Down syndrome (Saiz et al. 1998, 1999; Kenney et al. 2000;

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Lemstra et al. 2000; Zerr et al. 2000; Burkhard et al. 2001; Peoc’h et al. 2001). In our review of the literature, no previous report of CNS WD in any form has had documented positive CSF 14-3-3 protein. As previously discussed, CJD was not a strong consideration in this case given the absence of typical EEG and MRI findings, but our case is useful in adding Entinostat CNS WD to the list of diagnoses that should be considered when CSF 14-3-3 is positive, but the clinical picture does not fit with CJD. For the reasons outlined above, our case illustrates how difficult the diagnosis of isolated CNS WD can be to make. However, it also bears describing what the proper diagnostic and therapeutic steps should be if the diagnosis of isolated CNS WD is properly made. In CNS WD with gastrointestinal symptoms, the initial diagnostic procedure should be upper endoscopy with small bowel biopsy looking for T.