s also e pressed less UGDH protein in rat OA cartilage than that the normal cartilage. Taken together, the suppressed protein e pression and the unchanged enzyme activity of UGDH help to e plain selleck chem the inability of chondrocytes to handle the continuous GAG loss in the advanced OA. However, the OA cartilage samples from either the OA patients undergoing total knee replacement or the rats with papain induced OA, an aggressive model with an acute local inflammation in the joints and a rapid progress to the terminal stage of OA, were all at their advanced stages, which could not fully replicate the natural pathogenesis of OA dynamically. Other milder models with a more natural and mimic process, like the aging model and running model etc, would be better for the investigation in the role of UGDH in OA.

Meanwhile, how the e pression of UGDH was suppressed in articular chondrocytes still remained unclear. IL 1B is one of the major pro inflammatory factors highly e pressed in cartilage and synovium throughout the OA pathogenesis and responsible for the PGs loss and cartilage degeneration. However, Manei et al. reported that e ogenous IL 1B failed to modulate UGDH enzyme activity in articular chondrocytes, while Hickery et al. also found that IL 1, another member of the IL 1 family, could neither modulate UGDH activity. In the present study, we observed that UGDH gene e pression was stimulated by IL 1B after a 12 hour e posure, which was in accordance with the results from Manei et al, while obvious inhibitions of UGDH gene e pression were observed after IL 1B treatment at higher concentrations or for longer time, which thus resulted in the suppressed synthesis of GAG in the chondrocytes.

All these findings indicated that IL 1B might possibly be involed in the suppression of UGDH protein e pression in OA cartilage, and that the restricted UGDH e pression induced by IL 1B, rather than the negligible alteration of UGDH enzyme activity, that might participate in the compensation and decompensation of cartilage matri during OA pathogenesis. However, as IL 1B presents plentiful effects on cartilage, the functional measurement of IL 1B on GAG precursor synthesis would further strengthen the evidence in the Entinostat present study. Meanwhile, as there are multiple factors involved in OA pathogenesis, other stimuli including 17B oestradiol, TGF B and IGF 1 could also be involved in this process through modulate either the enzyme activity or gene e pression of UGDH.

Combining the evidences that UGDH plays an essential sellectchem role in GAG synthesis and cartilage homeostasis, we suggest that UGDH might be possibly a novel target for OA therapy. Previous studies have demonstrated that IL 1B acts through the activation of downstream signaling cascades. IL 1B binds to type 1 IL 1 receptor and then triggers the downstream cascade reaction, which finally leads to the activation of SAP JNK, p38 MAPK and NF ��B signaling pathway. However, although all the three pathways are involved in the met