6% to 10.6% (Table 2). Breaking down these reclassified cases further, 86% of these (319 of 370) were originally positive see more for solid or part-solid nodules between 4 and 6 mm. Notably, all 49 cases originally positive for nonsolid nodules were downgraded to benign under ACR Lung-RADS. Twenty-nine lung cancers were diagnosed in patients with positive baseline screening results among the 1,603 patients with clinical follow-up (average, 480 days). All diagnosed cancers were solid or part solid at baseline screening,

and all were positive under ACR Lung-RADS (Table 3). No false negatives were found in the 152 of 250 cases (61%) reclassified as benign with 12-month follow-up. ACR Lung-RADS increased the total PPV of the baseline CT lung screening examination by a factor of 2.5, from 6.9% (29 of 418) to 17.3% (29 of 168) (Table 2). Twenty-five of 29 cancers (86.3%) were Lung-RADS 4 “suspicious” at baseline screening, for a Lung-RADS 4 PPV of 37.9%. Excluding the 3 cases of presumed malignancy in patients unable to tolerate biopsy (and subsequently treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy) decreased the ACR Lung-RADS PPV to 15.5% (26 of 168). Mediastinal and/or hilar lymph nodes >1 cm in the short axis in the absence of pulmonary nodules ≥4 mm were present

in 1.6% of patients and were classified as incidental findings. In the 6.1% of baseline screens (98 of 1,603) with findings suspicious for infection or inflammation, 1 cancer (small cell histology) was detected within 12 months. No false negatives were detected in those patients

VRT752271 mouse of our cohort in whom positive findings were reclassified as benign when applying ACR Lung-RADS. This observation supports the notion that it is safe to follow solid nodules <6 mm and nonsolid nodules <20 mm in high-risk patients with annual CT surveillance. Our evaluation tuclazepam is limited by the relatively small number of patients reclassified as benign with ≥12-month follow-up (n = 152), from which we would expect to yield only 0.8 false negatives given the 0.5% PPV of these nodules in the NLST [1]. The apparent low likelihood of cancer in this group does suggest that the approach of following 4 to 6 mm solid pulmonary nodules incidentally found in lower risk patients (not meeting criteria for CT lung screening) 12 months after initial discovery is reasonable. When we applied the ACR Lung-RADS positive thresholds to our study cohort, it reduced our positive clinical CT lung screening rate to a level similar to that reported at 6 mm by the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program [2]. Our relative increase in PPV with ACR Lung-RADS (2.5×) was greater than we calculated would have occurred in the NLST at a 6-mm threshold (1.8×), which in part results from only increasing the positive threshold for solid nodules in our NLST analysis.