Two participants had to be excluded from further analyses because of poor data quality. Reaction times and accuracy of task-performance were measured for the behavioral analysis. Reaction times were collected within their individual 95% confidence interval. The power of oscillatory activity was

investigated by convolving the EEG signals with Morlet wavelets (Herrmann et al., 2005). The wavelet transform was performed for each OTX015 individual trial, and the absolute values of the resulting transforms were averaged. This measure of signal amplitude in single trials reflects the total activity for a certain frequency range. In the present study, we computed the power (μV2) of oscillatory activity. We confined the alpha activity to the frequency range from 8 to 12 Hz. Since it has been demonstrated that participants differ considerably in their “IAF” (Klimesch, 1999), the frequencies used in the wavelet analyses of alpha activity were determined individually for every participant. We employed a wavelet family with 7 as its constant ratio (Tallon-Baudry et al., 1997). In the case of 10 Hz, this yields a wavelet

duration of 222.8 ms and a spectral bandwidth of 2.9 Hz around its central frequency. In the present study, the mental state of sustained attention, before the onset of the probe digit, Vemurafenib was the main target to analyze. We principally focused on assessing EEG signals particularly in the period prior to the presentation of the probe digit. In such a prestimulus period, there was no stimulus-locked or event-related activity, so we conducted a frequency analysis, rather than an evoked potential analysis, in the prestimulus period. However, we performed additional event-related potential (ERP) analysis during the poststimulus period. For the total alpha activity, we computed the mean power in the time window from 800

to 200 ms prior to stimulus onset in each frequency range. This time window was chosen to avoid the temporal smearing of poststimulus activity into the prestimulus period. Within this time window, IAFs were obtained from the frequencies showing maximal eltoprazine power of each task in the alpha band on the electrodes P3, Pz, and P4. The range of the IAF across the participants was 8–12 Hz. No baseline correction was applied to the total alpha power, since the total alpha power in a prestimulus period would vanish after a baseline correction. Since the prestimulus alpha power was most pronounced around the parietal region during the sustained attention period (Fig. 2), we selected three electrodes representing parietal brain areas (i.e., P3, Pz, and P4) for further analysis. To make 3-D scalp distributions, as shown in Fig. 2B, source-localization software (sLORETA, version 20081104, The KEY Institute for Brain-Mind Research, Switzerland) was employed in the present study (Lehmann et al., 2012 and Pascual-Marqui, 2002).