These results provide evidence of the influence of nanocutting process on single-crystal FCC metals and consequently on the physical properties of the machining-induced surface. We can confirm that the physical properties of the machining-induced surface have altered

largely. Figure 6 Atomic potential energy views. The atomic potential energy of the machining-induced surface and pristine single-crystal copper with two different perspective angles in the machining-induced surface and pristine single-crystal copper. (a 1 ) and (a 2 ), the top view on the machining surface; (b 1 ) and (b 2 ), the interior defects inside the specimen. The hardness and Young’s modulus of the machining-induced surface The load and displacement data are monitored during the indentation process and then converted to the P-h curve which contains abundant information of the material, such as hardness, PLX4032 in vivo elastic modulus, and yield stress. Figure  7 is the load-displacement (or indentation depth) curve of a complete Trametinib mouse Nanoindentation from the MD simulation. It mainly consists of two portions, loading and unloading processes. Figure 7 Nanoindentation MD simulation

load-displacement curves on the machining-induced surface and pristine single-crystal copper. The indenter radius is 5.0 nm, and the maximum penetration depth is 2.5 nm. In Figure  7, the loading curves of the two surfaces present some different characteristics. The discontinuity can be clearly observed as for the copper with perfect structure, which agrees with conventional studies. click here However, the loading curve of the machining-induced surface is much smooth. The differences are due to the dislocation nucleation-induced elastic and plastic deformation transformation. Compared to the maximum energy needed to be developed and propagated in the machining-induced surface, it

is much larger in the pristine copper specimen. Since the high-energy initial defects have existed on the machining-induced surface, the power to trigger dislocation nucleation is less needed. When the dislocations emit from the dislocation nucleation and propagate in the specimen, the Montelukast Sodium accumulated energy is released. Therefore, the amplitude value of the indentation curve on the pristine surface is much larger than that on the machining-induced surface. According to the Oliver-Pharr method [6], nanoindentation hardness is defined as the indentation load divided by the projected contact area of the indentation. The indentation hardness (H) can be obtained at the peak load given by (7) where P max is the peak load and A c is the projected contact area. The projected contact area can be calculated from the relation as follows: (8) where h c is the contact depth which is given by [20] (9) where ϵ is a constant and depends on the geometry of the indenter (ϵ = 0.72 for cone indenter, ϵ = 0.