14 Herbert Lepor, MD: Does nerve-sparing surgery improve outcomes? Jason Engel, MD: At this point, I do not think that anyone would argue that sparing the Epigenetics inhibitor erectile nerves does not improve outcome. There is abundant literature that shows improvement in erection rates after prostatectomy when both versus 1 versus neither

nerve Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical bundle is spared. However, the quality of a nerve-sparing operation remains a subjective assessment, so there will always be inexactness to this claim. Robotic dissection and visualization allows surgeons to spare the nerve bundles in a more comprehensive and consistent manner. However, linearity between my subjective assessment of nerve sparing and whether erectile function returns cannot be proved. The importance of blood flow and the revascularization of the penis via collateralization are central to the recovery of erectile function after prostatectomy. Finding the best penile rehabilitation protocol is the highest priority in improving sexual Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical outcomes after prostatectomy. In highly experienced hands, surgical technique cannot Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical be refined much further in terms of nerve sparing. Herbert Lepor, MD: Does robotic prostatectomy improve outcomes? Jason D. Engel, MD: Dr. McCullough and I have just finished the MUSE RP-01 trial, which has provided some insight. As a multisite penile rehabilitation trial comparing daily MUSE®

(alprostadil urethral suppository; VIVUS, Inc, Mountain Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical View, CA) versus daily

Viagra® (sildenafil citrate; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) in both the open and robotic surgical setting, it has allowed a comparison of open versus robotic sexual outcomes within the same protocol. This makes MUSE Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical RP-01 truly unique, particularly given the fact that nearly 200 patients were enrolled prospectively and randomized. We found no differences in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores between open and robotic surgery, although we did show some significant differences favoring robotic surgery when looking at stretched penile length and intercourse success. Whether stretched penile length is a surrogate for penile health and eventual return of erectile function mafosfamide has not been fully established, so we are not sure of the significance of this finding. Whether the observations are real or due to intersite variability is not clear. This significant finding warrants further study. Nevertheless, although certainly not definitive, MUSE RP-01 has strengthened my own personal belief that there are inherent advantages of the robotic approach that lead to improved sexual outcomes. Herbert Lepor, MD: As far as penile length, it is important to note that the difference in outcome may simply be due to the fact that the penis was stretched more vigorously at the robotic surgical site than at the open surgical site.