Districts A and D, for instance, were able to significantly

reduce mean sugar content in their selleck chemicals lunch meals, whereas District C’s mean sugar content for the same meal category slightly increased (Table 4A and Table 4B). Aside from a slight increase in protein, District D did not improve on most of the nutrients for breakfast and District A’s breakfast data were incomplete. District B baseline data for fiber, sugar, and sodium breakfast nutrients were missing, thus percent changes were not calculated for these nutrients. For the school lunch programs, Districts A, C and D were able to achieve more substantive improvements (Table 4A and Table 4B). District A reduced mean calories by 15.7%, mean sugar by 32.4%,

and mean sodium by 21.6% for its lunches. District D was able to achieve similar results, while District B reduced mean calories by only 2.9% and did not possess baseline data to assess for changes in fiber, sugar, or sodium nutrient content. Although District C increased overall calories, fat, saturated fat, and sugar, it was able to reduce sodium and increase dietary fiber and protein in their lunch offerings. Collectively, the estimated number of children Selumetinib supplier and adolescents reached by the school-based nutrition interventions in both counties was estimated to be 688,197 students for the SY 2011–12 (Table 2). Net fewer calories (kcal) offered as a result of the nutrition interventions was estimated to be about 64,075 kcal per student per year for LAC and 22,887 kcal per student per year for SCC. Overall, reductions in calories, sugar and sodium content

of student meals offered by LAC and SCC schools were achieved in the five school districts that modified their SY 2011–12 menus. These results, however, reflect only average nutrient changes by meal categories; they do not correspond to other salient factors that may also influence student nutrition — e.g., food presentation and appeal; taste of the new items; perceptions of freshness and food quality; density, composition or quality of the individual Phosphoprotein phosphatase offerings including the number and type (variety) of entrées or sides prepared or available to choose from; and student food selection and actual consumption (or waste). In LAC and SCC, for example, the entrée or side variety changed from SY 2010–11 to SY 2011–12, reflecting the school districts’ emphasis on not only meeting nutrient limits, but also addressing the context leading to food selection and consumption — i.e., using a food-based menu planning approach. In LAC, the 2010–11 lunch menu had items such as beef chalupa, pepperoni pizza, and Italian calzone with turkey pepperoni; whereas, the new 2011–12 lunch menu included black eyed pea salad, vegetable curry, Ancho chili chicken with yakisoba, and quinoa and veggie salads.