76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.61-3.91), they felt the hospice team provided the right amount Entinostat molecular weight of emotional support to them (AOR = 2.21, 95% CI= 2.07-2.38), they felt that the hospice team provided them with accurate information about the patient’s medical treatment (AOR = 2.16, 95 % CI= 2.06-2.27), and they could identify one nurse as being in charge of their loved one’s care (AOR = 2.02, CI = 1.92-2.13). These four key processes of care appear to significantly influence an “excellent” rating of overall
satisfaction with hospice care.”
“Purpose: When one is performing online setup correction for prostate positioning displacements prior to daily dose delivery, intrafraction motion can become a limiting factor to prostate targeting accuracy. The aim of this study was to quantify and characterize prostate intrafraction motion assessed by multiple kilovoltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) imaging of implanted markers during treatment in a large patient group.\n\nMethods and Materials: Intrafraction motion
in the sagittal plane was studied by retrospective analysis of displacements of implanted gold markers on (nearly) lateral kV and MV images obtained at various time points during the treatment fractions (mean, 27 per patient) in 108 consecutive patients. The effective prostate motion in a fraction was defined as the time-weighted mean displacement.\n\nResults: Prostate displacements in the sagittal plane increased during the fraction (mean, 0.2 +/- Bucladesine molecular weight 0.2 mm/min). Forty percent of patients had a systematic (i.e., appearing in all fractions) effective displacement in the sagittal plane greater than 2 mm. Observed effective population mean-of-means (mu eff) vertical bar/ systematic (Sigma eff) intrafraction motion (mu(eff) +/- Sigma(eff)) was 0.9 +/- 1.1 mm and 0.6 +/- 1.0 mm for the anterior-posterior and superior inferior directions,
respectively. Corresponding random motion (sigma(eff)) was 1.2 mm and 1.1 mm. Mean effective prostate motion in the first 5 fractions was predictive for mean effective displacement in the remaining this website fractions (p < 0.001).\n\nConclusion: For a large subgroup of patients, the systematic component of intrafraction prostate motion was substantial. Intrafraction motion correction prior to each beam delivery or offline corrections could likely be beneficial for the subgroup of patients with significant motion. The systematic component is well predicted by measurements in the initial fractions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.”
“Surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was long considered the standard approach for the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. This was based on results of several randomized trials demonstrating its effectiveness over the best medical therapy. In the past two decades, patients identified high-risk for surgery were offered carotid artery stenting (CAS) as a less invasive option.