10–0 26) Similarly, treatment with erlotinib significantly impro

10–0.26). Similarly, treatment with erlotinib significantly improved the objective response rate (83% vs 36%) [27]. In the EURTAC trial, 174 chemonaive patients with EGFR mutation (Exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation) were randomly assigned to erlotinib or platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary-endpoint was progression-free survival which was significantly improved with erlotinib (median 9.7 vs 5.2 months, HR 0.37). The difference in overall survival was not statistically significant, but more than 80% of patients initially treated with chemotherapy subsequently received an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor [28]. Cetuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular

domain of the EGFR, which suppresses EGFR-mediated cell signaling by blocking ligand binding to the receptor. As an IgG1 antibody, cetuximab may also kill tumor cells via an immune mechanism: http://www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk1120212-jtp-74057.html antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Accordingly, cetuximab works differently from the TKIs. Phase III clinical trials have shown that cetuximab prolongs survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In lung cancer, cetuximab was evaluated in first line

setting. Phase II study of patients with EGFR positive and EGFR-negative advanced NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative 17-AAG solubility dmso Oncology Group performance status 0–1, assigned to receive cetuximab 400 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on week 1 followed by weekly doses of cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IV. A cycle was considered as 4 weeks of treatment and therapy was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The response rate

for all patients (n = 66) was 4.5% (95% CI: 0.9–12.7%) and the stable disease rate was 30.3% (95% CI: 19.6–42.9%). The response rate for patients with EGFR-positive tumors (n = 60) was 5% (95% CI: 1.0–13.9%). The median time to progression for all patients was 2.3 months (95% CI: 2.1–2.6 months) and median survival time was 8.9 months Baf-A1 solubility dmso (95% CI: 6.2–12.6 months). Although the response rate with single-agent cetuximab in this heavily pretreated patient population with advanced NSCLC was only 4.5%, the disease control rates and overall survival seem comparable to that of pemetrexed, docetaxel, and erlotinib in similar groups of patients [29]. The phase 3 FLEX (first-line treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor inhibitor [EGFR]-EXpressing advanced NSCLC) trial, of cetuximab combined with vinorelbine/cisplatin, met its primary endpoint of increasing OS when compared with chemotherapy alone; this study enrolled 1125 patients with advanced NSCLC who had evidence of EGFR expression. While median PFS was the same in both treatment groups (4.8 months), median OS was 11.3 months in the group that received cetuximab vs 10.1 months in the group that received chemotherapy alone (p = .044).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>