Figure 2B shows overlapping among the canonical pathways detected as significant, which were divided into three buy Lenvatinib clusters. The largest cluster consists of drug metabolism-related pathways as described above. Interestingly, two other clusters, histidine degradation-related and gluconeogenesis-related, were also detected with no overlap between the drug metabolism-related cluster and them. We then summarized Affymetrix probe IDs, gene symbols and gene names for each gene in our classifier and divided them into four categories, drug metabolism, gluconeogenesis, histidine degradation and the other

(Table 4), based on the canonical pathway analysis. Of 22 genes, 10 genes were drug metabolism-related. Our classifier was shown again, with genes converted

from Affymetrix probe IDs to gene symbols and colored according to their category (Figure 3). The mostly drug metabolism-related nature of our classifier was confirmed, as most of the rules in the classifier included drug Selleckchem Dabrafenib one or more metabolism-related genes (shown in red). When increased liver weight was targeted, CBA outperformed LDA in all of the three criteria: accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. In contrast, when decreased liver weight was targeted, both CBA and LDA scored low sensitivities and high specificities. These tendencies are attributable to the low frequency of decreased liver weight in the data set. For such a data set, a classifier returning a negative answer (i.e. no for decreased liver weight) with a high frequency, regardless of predictivity, can score a good specificity but a poor sensitivity. Except for such an imbalanced data set, CBA succeeded in building a better predictive classifier than LDA in this study. This superiority of CBA over LDA is considered to reflect

the non-linear nature of the data set. Generally, a drug-induced response (or more generally biological response) is considered to Celecoxib be caused not by the single mechanism, but by several different mechanisms. Thus, there are several different, not necessarily linearly separable, gene expression patterns that finally lead to the same response (e.g. increased liver weight). In this light, CBA is likely to build a better classifier for a data set in toxicology, or more broadly biology, than LDA, as CBA can captures linearly inseparable patterns residing in the data set. We also compared between CBA and CBA-DR, our modified version of the original CBA. When increased liver weight was targeted, CBA-DR marked lower accuracy than CBA. Interestingly however, CBA-DR marked 100% sensitivity. This can be said as follows: if CBA returns an “Inc” answer for liver weight and we know the default rule is not applied in the classification process, we can say that liver weight would be increased with higher confidence than if we don’t know whether the default rule is applied or not.