J Med Microbiol 2008, 57:1306–1307.PubMedCrossRef 29. Wallet F, Nseir S, Baumann L, Herwegh S, Sendid B: Preliminary clinical study using a multiplex real-time PCR test for the detection of bacterial and fungal DNA directly in blood. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010, 16:774–779.PubMedCrossRef 30. Bauer M, Reinhart K: Molecular diagnostics of sepsis – Where are we today? Int J Med Microbiol

2010, 300:411–413.PubMedCrossRef 31. Tissari P, Zumla A, Tarkka E, Mero S, Savolainen L, Vaara M, Aittakorpi A, Laakso S, Lindfors M, Piiparinen H, Maki M, Carder C, Huggett J, Gant V: Accurate and rapid identification of bacterial BI 10773 cell line species from positive blood cultures with a DNA based microarray platform: an observational study. Lancet 2010, PF299804 375:224–230.PubMedCrossRef 32. Cleven BEE, Palka-Santini M, Gielen J, Meembor S, Krönke M, Krut O: Identification and characterization of bacterial pathogens causing bloodstream infections by DNA microarray. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44:2389–2397.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 33. Lucignano B, Ranno Ruxolitinib S, Liesenfeld O, Pizzorno B, Putignani L, Bernaschi P, Menichella D: Multiplex PCR allows rapid and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections in newborns and

children with suspected sepsis. J Clin Microbiol 2011, 49:2252–2258.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 34. Lim CS, Tung CH, Rosli R, Chong PP: An alternative Candida spp. cell wall disruption method using a basic sorbitol lysis buffer and glass beads. J Microbiol Methods 2008, 75:576–578.PubMedCrossRef

35. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1988, 16:1215–1218.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 36. Liu D, Coloe S, Baird R, Pederson learn more J: Rapid mini-preparation of fungal DNA for PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38:471.PubMedCentralPubMed 37. Lott TJ, Kuykendall RJ, Reiss E: Nucleotide sequence analysis of the 5.8S rDNA and adjacent ITS2 region of Candida albicans and related species. Yeast 1993, 9:1199–1206.PubMedCrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions ÁH: helped in the design, performed the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. ZP: provided the clinical samples, helped in the analysis and interpretation of the data and revised the manuscript. EU: provided all the clinical bacterial samples and critiqued the manuscript. CsV: have made substantial contributions to concept and design, provided the fungal samples and revised the manuscript. FS: designed all the experiments, participated in the writing of the manuscript, revised the manuscript and gave final approval of the version to be published. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.