Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated dendritic cells (DCs) from active BD patients showed a higher level of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-23 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α production. FICZ or ITE GSK2126458 cost significantly inhibited the production of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23 and TNF-α, but induced IL-10 production by DCs derived from

active BD patients and normal controls. FICZ or ITE-treated DCs significantly inhibited the T helper type 17 (Th17) and Th1 cell response. Activation of AhR either by FICZ or ITE inhibits DC differentiation, maturation and function. Further studies are needed to investigate whether manipulation of the AhR pathway may be used to treat BD or other autoimmune diseases. Apoptosis inhibitor “
“After infection or vaccination, antigen-specific T cells proliferate then contract in numbers to a memory set point. T-cell contraction is observed after both acute and prolonged infections although it is unknown if contraction is regulated similarly in both scenarios. Here, we show that contraction of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells is markedly reduced in TNF/perforin-double deficient (DKO) mice responding to attenuated Listeria monocytogenes infection. Reduced contraction

in DKO mice was associated with delayed clearance of infection and sustained T-cell proliferation during the normal contraction interval. Mechanistically, sustained T-cell proliferation mapped to prolonged infection in the absence of TNF; however, reduced contraction required the additional absence of perforin since T cells in mice lacking either TNF or perforin (singly deficient) underwent normal contraction. Thus, while T-cell contraction after acute infection is independent of peforin, a perforin-dependent pathway plays a previously unappreciated role to mediate contraction of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells during

prolonged L. monocytogenes infection. “
“The recent article in Immunology by Park et al.[1] entitled ‘Interleukin-32 Loperamide enhances cytotoxic effect of natural killer cells to cancer cells via activation of death receptor 3’ is very interesting; however, I believe that non-specialist readers would benefit from a more expansive and detailed discussion of its context. The authors have omitted much of the recent literature detailing the broader biological functions of Death Receptor 3 (DR3), most of which do not relate to regulating cell death. In addition, clarification is also required with regards to the ligands of DR3 because the older nomenclature can cause confusion and is particularly pertinent to the interpretation of this study. Towards the end of 1996 and beginning of 1997, DR3 (TNFRSF25) was reported simultaneously by a number of groups as a tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) member with an intracellular, apoptosis-inducing death domain and was ascribed a variety of names – Apo3, LARD, TR3, TRAMP and WSL-1.