The high-resolution TEM image shown in Figure 4f confirms these f

The high-resolution TEM image shown in Figure 4f confirms these finding. The nanotube walls have a thickness of about 10 nm and consist of 25 to 30 graphitic layers. The crystalline structure is rather good, with most of the graphitic layers aligned along the nanotube axis. Figure 4 SEM and TEM images of carbon YM155 nanotubes grown in 750°C process, Fe only series (C 2 H 4 EVP4593 solubility dmso , no S1813; Table 1 ). (a, b) Side view, nanotubes are present

on the membrane top only, the channels are empty; (c, d) top view; and (e, f) the multi-walled nanotubes contain approximately 25 to 30 walls. Similar experiments on the growth of nanotubes in C2H2 atmosphere without S1813 have shown quite similar results (curved nanotubes on the alumina membrane top, no nanotubes in the membrane channels), but the TEM analysis

has revealed a nearly amorphous structure. This observation is likely due to the rather low process temperature which was not sufficient for crystallization, even in the presence of Fe catalyst. The experiments of the Fe + S1813 series, i.e. growth on samples prepared with the use of both Fe catalyst and S1813 photoresist, have demonstrated nucleation of the carbon nanotubes inside the membrane pores as well as the formation of a nanotube mat on the top of membrane, as can be seen in Figure 5a,b. Indeed, Figure 5a shows a dense nanotube layer on the membrane top, whereas Figure 5b which is an SEM image of the broken side surface of the membrane clearly reveals the origin of the nanotubes in see more the channels. Short ends of the nanotubes of about 100 to 200 nm are protruding from the channels of the membrane. PtdIns(3,4)P2 More SEM images of the nanotubes grown in C2H4 with S1813 photoresist can be found in Additional file 1: Figure S2. Figure 5 SEM images. (a, b) SEM images of the carbon nanotubes grown in the 750°C process, Fe + S1813 series (C2H4 + S1813 + Fe,

see Table 1). Nanotubes protruding from the membrane channels are clearly visible in (b). (c, d) SEM images of the carbon nanotubes grown in the 750°C process, Fe + S1813 + Plasma series (C2H4 + S1813 + plasma). (e, f) Nanotubes grown in the ‘900°C’ process, Fe + S1813 + Plasma series (CH4 + S1813 + plasma). A better degree of control was obtained in Fe + S1813 + Plasma series, i.e. in growing the nanotubes on alumina plasma-treated membranes. Figure 5c,d shows SEM images of the nanotubes grown by 750°C process (C2H4 + S1813 + plasma). Importantly, the thick fibrous mat of entangled nanotubes was not found in this case, but all nanotubes look like they have been cut near the membrane surface. Moreover, the nanotube ends are not deformed, and the nanotubes are open. A similar experiment in CH4 (S1813 + Fe + plasma, at 900°C) has demonstrated a similar structure with many nanotubes protruding from the pores but not forming the mat (Figure 5e).

Comments are closed.