“
“While for many years, at both the global and the country levels, the focus of immunization programmes has been on infants and a limited number of traditional vaccines, the

vaccine world has evolved with new demands and expectations of global and national policy makers, donors, other interested parties, and the public. The development and availability of several new vaccines targeting a variety of age groups, the emergence of new technologies, the increased public focus on vaccine safety issues, the enhanced procedures for regulation and approval of vaccines, the need to expand the immunization schedule with consideration of all age groups and specific at-risk populations are all demanding increased attention [1]. Key to improving routine immunization programmes and sustainably introducing new vaccines and immunization technologies see more is for countries to ensure that they have the necessary evidence and clear processes to enable informed decision making in the www.selleckchem.com/products/dabrafenib-gsk2118436.html establishment of immunization programme priorities and the introduction of new programme strategies, vaccines and technologies. Similarly, such evidence and processes are needed to justify the continuation of, or any necessary adjustments to, existing immunization programmes and policies. Whereas developing countries have long struggled with vaccine funding problems and limited ability to optimize coverage with standard immunization

programs, even industrialized nations today face problems involving the financing and delivery of expanded vaccine programs. While there is increased funding flowing through new financing mechanisms to support the introduction of new vaccines by developing countries [2], [3] and [4], from a public health perspective, the overall limited financial resources require that distribution of funds must be undertaken in as fair and as effective a manner as possible in order to during achieve the best possible outcomes. Therefore decisions on introducing new vaccines into national immunization programs should be unbiased, comprehensive and systematic and based on deliberate,

rational, comprehensible and evidence-based criteria [5]. Certainly all governments have to consider opportunity costs in their investments. At Libraries present, the majority of industrialized and some developing countries have formally constituted national technical advisory bodies to guide immunization policies. Other countries are only starting to work towards or are just contemplating the establishment of such bodies. Still others have not even embarked on thinking about such a body. These advisory bodies are often referred to as National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) and will be referred to as such in the remainder of this document. They can also be referred to using different names such as National Advisory Committee on Immunization or National Committee on Immunization Practice to name a few of the most commonly used titles.