While typical infant ERP studies create average waveforms for subjects with a minimum of 10 good trials, because the recruitment of full-term HII

infants with only mild-to-moderate HII injury was especially limited (as, for example, HII is much more common selleck compound in premature infants), we used more liberal exclusionary criteria at this stage in processing. Average waveforms were then visually examined by an experimenter with expertise in infant ERP who was blind to participant group, and infants were excluded if the averaged waveforms showed excess noise for at least one of the three conditions. The number of subjects lost at each phase of ERP processing is described in Table 4. Of subjects who wore the EEG net for at least 20 trials per condition, 57% of CON (16/28) and 75% of HII (6/8) were accepted into the final analysis. For the final sample, the mean number of accepted trials did not differ between CON (M = 37.13, SD = 6.93) and HII (M = 42.67,

SD = 11.62); t(20) = −1.39, p = .18, d = 0.67). Analyses focused on two regions: (1) frontocentral electrodes, which were grouped into left (19, 24, 29, 30), middle (5, 6, 12, 13, 112, VREF), and right (4, 105, 111, 124) regions of interest, and (2) temporal electrodes, which were grouped into left (34, 38, 44, 45, 46) and right (102, 108, 114, 116, 121; see Figure 2). Mean amplitude values for the Nc and PSW components were extracted for each individual participant for each stimulus condition at each of the scalp regions (averaging each amplitude value within the specified NVP-BKM120 chemical structure time window). The time windows for the Nc and PSW were determined, using prior work on infant ERP waveforms as a guide (de Haan, Johnson, & Halit, 2003; Nelson & McCleery, 2008), by examining the grand mean average waveforms

for all CON and HII subjects, collapsed across condition, to narrow in on the time windows encompassing the components of interest in our group of infants (see also Figures 3 and 4). Nc mean amplitude was calculated to include the negative deflection occurring between 175 and 650 ms following stimulus onset, and the PSW mean amplitude was calculated to include the subsequent positive deflection Org 27569 occurring between 750 and 1,500 ms following stimulus onset. For the 18 CON and six HII that contributed sufficient data from the VPC familiarization phase and all three test delays, there was no difference in total looking during familiarization (CON: M = 15.8 sec, SD = 3.8 sec; HII: M = 16.8 sec, SD = 3.4 sec; t(22) = −0.55, p = .59, d = .28). A preliminary ANOVA including test version as the between-subjects factor revealed no main effects of this variable, and the present analysis therefore collapsed across this factor.