05)However,there was no significant difference in age(>55, 86%)

05).However,there was no significant difference in age(>55, 8.6%), systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, complicated with other organ injury(72.8%, 59/81), infuse erythrocyte(33.3%, 27/81) between two groups(P > 0.05). Maraviroc The complications about liver injury undergoing NOM is preffered for the care of penetrating trauma, combine peri-liver vascular injury, shock, injury grade and amount of hemoperitoneum,shock

and combine peri-liver vascular injury was the independently predict-factors,irrespective of age, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, complicated with other organ injury and infuse erythrocyte Conclusion: NOM is safe and effective in traumatic hepatic injury,it appears when the hemodynamic is stability neither age, penetrating trauma, injury grade,nor degree of hemoperitoneum(amount of

intraperitoneal blood),are contraindications to NOM. Key Word(s): 1. traumatic injury; 2. NOM; 3. effect factor; 4. complication; Presenting Author: YUNHONG WU Additional Authors: LIANG ZHU Corresponding Author: LIANG ZHU Affiliations: School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University; Department of Physiology, Dalian Medical University Objective: LDLT(living donor Fulvestrant solubility dmso liver transplantation, LDLT) is an advanced medical technique for the treatment of patients with terminal stage for irreversible liver failure. However, related ethical issues arise with the development and application of the technique. We further studied the ethical issues of LDLT in china. Methods: Methods of literature review, comparative study, the research of situation, developmental study and case study and Delphi technique were adopted. The domestic and foreign research achievements about relevant techniques, policies, laws and regulations of LDLT 上海皓元 were systematically reviewed, analyzed and summarized. Computer-online search of Internet websites and professional periodical databases was undertaken

to identify the domestic relevant media reports, and research in the fields of Hygienic Law, Medical Science, and Medical Ethics. Ideas were exchanged with experts engaged in LDLT for many years and professors in teaching Hygienic Law and Medical Ethics for years. The research was analyzed based on the actuality of LDLT in china. Results: This paper given a rational thinking from censure of medical humanitarianism due to the principle of doing no harm in medical, question to the principle of family due to the different values of the members of family, guarantee of the equality in LDLT due to the serious shortage of living donors and commercialization the living organs due to the pursuit of profit. Conclusion: We should set up the newly ethical conception, prohibit the organ business, regulate the organ transplantation ethical review process, strengthen LDLT’s medical ethical review ability construction and examination ways and perfect LDLT related laws and regulations system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>