The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders is rapidly increasing, perpetuating a clear and present public health risk (Wild et al 2004). There is substantial evidence that intensive clinic-based lifestyle interventions targeting increased physical activity and reduced energy intake are effective in producing significant weight loss and improving Type 2 diabetes biomarkers (Norris et al 2004). However, evidence is lacking regarding the feasibility

of translating these interventions into the wider community. The ‘Living Well with Diabetes’ trial described in this paper delivered a weight loss intervention entirely over the telephone in an attempt to increase program reach beyond the metropolitan Vorinostat ic50 clinic setting. It used an evidence-based combined approach of increasing energy expenditure through

physical activity, and reducing energy intake through healthy eating principles; importantly it incorporated behavioural change strategies to target and individualise the program according to participant need and circumstances, to increase program uptake and adherence. Although the program conferred benefits in weight loss, energy intake reduction, dietary quality and physical activity, the effects sizes were relatively small with few Type 2 diabetes participants meeting program targets. Additionally, no change in blood glucose was detected, possibly due to lack of program focus on medication adherence. Effects were ABT199 greatest crotamiton in program completers who received the majority of calls, favouring those who were retired. Study outcomes point to the dilemma for clinicians of targeting programs to those most able or motivated to change compared with a ‘take all comers’ approach, to optimise inclusion of those from socially disadvantaged and minority groups. It is likely that more flexible modular approaches in goal setting and delivery, including internet and pervasive smart phone technology, will be necessary to achieve greater program impact

and reach, as demonstrated in successful secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (Neubeck et al 2011). “
“Summary of: Shimodozono M, et al (2013) Benefits of a repetitive facilitative exercise program for the upper paretic extremity after subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27: 296–305. [Prepared by Marco YC Pang, CAP Editor.] Question: Does repetitive facilitative exercise improve paretic upper limb function in individuals with subacute stroke? Design: Randomised, controlled trial and blinded outcome assessment. Setting: Two inpatient rehabilitation centres in Japan. Participants: Adults with confirmed stroke of 3–13 weeks duration and upper limb Brunnstrom Stage ≥ III (beginning voluntary movement) were key inclusion criteria. Cerebellar lesions, and arm contractures/pain were key exclusion criteria.