In addition, each rat received an IP injection of saline 1 day before the induction phase of AMPH sensitization. Half of the rats were then administered a single daily AMPH (1 mg/kg IP) injection (sensitized group; SEN) and half were administered saline (non-sensitized group; NON) for four consecutive days while Antiinfection Compound Library research buy locomotor activity was recorded (Robinson, 1984; Robinson & Becker, 1986). Spontaneous locomotor behaviour was monitored in activity chambers (Truscan Activity Monitoring System; Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown, PA, USA). Each chamber (39 × 42 × 50 cm) had four transparent Plexiglas walls and a removable plastic tray at the bottom. Chambers were placed in sound-attenuating boxes in a dark room.
Locomotor Sunitinib datasheet activity was monitored for a period of 120 min, by recording infrared beam interruptions on two sensor rings placed around the chambers (on the outside of the Plexiglas walls), creating a 16 × 16 beam matrix. The monitoring session was divided into pre-injection (30 min) and
post-injection (90 min) components, during which the truscan Software recorded total time spent moving. All rats were tested throughout the experiment in the same respective activity chamber at the same time of day. After a 1-week AMPH withdrawal period, rats were administered an initial AMPH challenge (0.5 mg/kg IP) to determine whether they exhibited sensitization to the locomotor stimulating effects of AMPH (see Fig. 1 for experimental timeline). The doses selected for the subsequent challenge injections were based on a pilot study, in Adenylyl cyclase which it was observed that AMPH doses > 0.25 mg/kg resulted in stereotypy (data not shown). As stated
previously, rats were divided into two main groups, SEN (n = 32) and NON (n = 32). Within each of these groups and following the initial AMPH challenge, rats were assigned to one of four E2 groups: SEN with low E2 replacement (n = 16), SEN with high E2 replacement (n = 16), NON with low E2 replacement (n = 16) and NON with high E2 replacement (n = 16). These groups were each then further divided into two conditions depending upon whether they received chronic HAL or chronic saline (SAL). The final group designations were as follows: sensitized, with high E2 replacement and HAL (HE; HE/SEN; n = 8), sensitized with high E2 replacement and SAL (SE; SE/SEN; n = 8), sensitized with low E2 replacement and HAL (He; He/SEN; n = 8), low E2 replacement and SAL (Se; Se/SEN; n = 8), non-sensitized with high E2 and HAL (HE/NON; n = 8), non-sensitized with high E2 and SAL (SE/NON; n = 8), non-sensitized with low E2 and HAL (He/NON; n = 8) and non-sensitized with low E2 and SAL (Se/NON; n = 8). Rats were administered four subsequent AMPH (0.25 mg/kg, IP) challenges on days 2, 10 and 12 of HAL or SAL treatment and 1 week after discontinuation of HAL treatment. Locomotor activity was assessed on days 2 and 12 in order to compare short- versus long-term HAL treatment.